A fascinating idea and a brilliant execution. However, as they say, hell is paved with good intentions and my problem with this is who validates the validator?

You’re making an unappealable “Russian influence” statement. To me, this is not a scholarly point and from where I’m from, the extension would be going ape shit about how this statement is from a paper “funded by…” fill in the blank.

The essence of a scientific research is seeking the truth, not finding confirmation of your own bias. We are so used to being manipulated that it’s almost impossible to find a point you made 5 years ago that you can still stick to today.

Although the idea is amazing, in my opinion, nothing will replace your own quest for truth and evolution of understanding.